From digest.v7.n409 Thu Oct 9 12:28:16 1997
From: Satch Carlson <satch_at_alaska.net>
Date: Thu, 09 Oct 1997 08:08:44 -0800
Subject: Winter tires...again? Already?!/satch
Jake Steijn says:
> I think you are going to hear from a number of sources that Bridgestone
> Blizzaks or Hakkapilita (mumblestuff cause I never could get it right - some
> Finnish tire) are the best...
Why a guy with a name spelled "Steijn" cannot figure out the spelling of
"Hakkapeliitta"---a simple Finnish word meaning "Let it snow let it snow
let it snow"---is beyond me. The thing to remember is that the
University of Norway, among others, is noted for testing winter tires:
Seems to me the last Hot Set Up that I can recall was the Gislaved Frost
II. . . the Hakkas fell to third or fourth niftiest, along with the
way-cool Michelinos. Ah! But! Remember, these are people looking for
TRACTION, not road-surface preservation, so we're talking about STUDDED
radials. . . and Michelin does not send their studdable donuts across
the pond. The butt-heads.
As for unstudded winter tires, I have no personal experience with the
highly-touted Blizzaks, but I have heard others talk about their awful
dry-tarmac performance. I HAVE run a few sets of Michelin
Alpins---that's Michelino's version of the hydrophilic ice grabber using
a zillion tiny sipes---on ice and snow and dirt and gravel and wet
asphalt and dry tarmac, and I liked them a lot. . . but unless you
reserve them for the icy months you will wear them out right pronto.
Especially if you decide they ought to work just fine in the Press On
Regardless Rally. Which they will. . .
Now, then: Brother Steijhln (some of those letters are silent) mentions
fat-boy tires in snow. Heh heh heh. Big surprise for those mullets who
think wide is better. . . For snow, you want the skinniest tires you can
find (SAAB used to run winter rallies on tires that were 3 1/2" wide!)
to cut down THROUGH the snow and find something hard to grab onto. . .
and studs to do the grabbing.
A caveat: Driving con brio, con gusto over the ice and snow is indeed
what we were meant for, but remember that drift angle is a factor of
traction. Studded and non-studded tires alike WILL fall out from under
you in the corners, which is to be expected, anticipated, and enjoyed.
The big difference is what they do AFTER they come out: Studded tires
are constantly clawing their way back into the ice and asphalt, while
unstudded tires, once they lose their grip, seem perfectly content to
remain in a traction-free environment. Some of us who have become used
to the car's "coming back" at a certain point in a drifting arc have
discovered that our subconscious assumptions, formed from way too many
years spent sideways on studded Hakkas, need some adjustment. This
discovery is usually a traumatic epiphany indeed. . .
Your opinion may differ. Ask me if I care.
[ Help ]