September 14 1997
> Angry owners sue Land Rover over corrosion
> [Image] > by Jonathan Leake > Transport Correspondent > > > LAND ROVER, manufacturer of choice for the > upwardly mobile 1990s family, is facing a > lawsuit by owners who allege some of its > top-selling models suffer from an in-built > tendency to corrode. > > The motorists claim construction of the > models, popular with families keen to foster > the notion that they spend their weekends > indulging in energetic outdoor pursuits, are > based on an outdated 1940s design which they > argue leads to corrosion within a few years > of purchase. > > Sales of the Defender, Discovery and Range > Rover have boomed in recent years on the > back of the demand for four-wheel-drive > vehicles, taking Land Rover out of its > traditional rural setting and into the urban > jungle. Last year the company sold 68,500 > vehicles. > > The lawsuit, which could eventually cost > Land Rover millions in legal costs, > compensation and lost sales, has been > brought by three disgruntled Land Rover > owners in America as a class action, which > means owners across the United States could > use it to make claims of their own.
>
> The company, which sold more than a third of
> its models in America last year, is
> vigorously fighting the claims and says its
> cars are no more prone to corrosion than any
> other marque. The American claims are,
> however, backed by some dealers and owners
> in Britain.
>
> One owner, Paul Wynter, a telecommunications
> expert from Brighton in East Sussex, was so
> angry he set up an Internet web site
> complete with close-up pictures of the holes
> in his corroding vehicle. Land Rover paid
> him more than #10,000 for the vehicle
> provided he dismantled the web site. "I
> bought the Land Rover to impress customers
> but within a few months it was starting to
> corrode," he said.
>
> The American case was made possible by
> legislation there which says firms cannot
> market goods which are inherently faulty,
> including vehicles prone to excessive
> corrosion. In Britain, by contrast,
> corrosion in motor vehicles is regarded as a
> natural process, however fast it happens.
>
> The case hinges on the claim that Land
> Rover's use of aluminium body panels bolted
> to a steel chassis and body frame is known
> to encourage corrosion.
>
> The method was introduced in the late 1940s
> to save steel, which was still rationed. The
> writ says the company has long known that
> joining the two metals together sets up an
> electrolytic chemical reaction that makes
> corrosion inevitable.
>
> It adds: "Land Rover consumers are buying a
> ticking timebomb, for the vehicles will
> eventually corrode, leaving their owners
> with either a useless pile of metal or
> thousands of dollars in repair bills."
>
> Such claims are supported by a number of
> independent British Land Rover dealers. They
> say the trouble spots include the engine
> compartment, door panels and tailgate.
>
> Ken Sole, of Peterborough Four-Wheel Drive,
> a Land Rover specialist since 1967, said
> corrosion problems were widespread: "They
> market their vehicles as being very tough so
> everyone thinks Land Rovers will last for
> ever, but sadly they rot much faster than
> most ordinary saloons. Every engineer knows
> that joining different metals together is a
> recipe for disaster."
>
> Steve Drawater, a probation officer from
> Canterbury, who bought a Land Rover Defender
> in December 1995, has already had to replace
> the rear door after it began corroding. He
> now has a similar problem on the near-side
> wing. "I think Land Rover are a victim of
> their own success. They cannot cope with the
> demand and are sacrificing quality for
> quantity," he said.
>
> A Land Rover spokesman accepted there had
> been a limited problem with corrosion on
> some models, mainly Defenders, but said it
> had since been solved: "We are trying to
> deal with all those who suffered problems in
> a very sympathetic way. We changed our
> construction methods so that, wherever
> possible, aluminium and steel do not come
> into direct contact."
>
> Additional reporting: Mark Macaskill